- Follow Data Center Infrastructure & Critical Facility Evolution on WordPress.com
- 6sigmaDC 6SigmaFM ace airflow capacity CFD cloud cooling Datacenter data center data center infrastructure management datacenters Data Centre datacentre DCIM Design digital efficiencies efficiency energy engineering Facilities fragmentation future facilities infrastructure IT LinkedIn management modeling modular monitoring optimization pDCIM power predict Predictive DCIM simulation uptime virtual data center Virtual Facility
- Airline Networks: from hub-and-spoke to point-to-point networks
- 3 Ways #DataCenters Can Use #CFD Modeling Right Now
- Science could make fire suppression safe #datacenter #simulation
- #Datacenter Operational Planning with #Engineering #Simulation
- 10 Most Connected #DataCenters
- How to succeed with The Performance Indicator #datacenter #datacentre @TheGreenGrid @6SigmaDC
- @TheGreenGrid New #DataCenter Metric – Performance Indicator – Explained
- #DataCenter Efficiency – Using #CFD Simulation to Optimize Cooling in Design & Operation
- Airflow Management Can Help #DataCenter Operators Realize Robust Energy Savings
- Data Centers aren’t doing enough to be green
- Uncovering the Value of Calibrating #DataCenter #CFD Models
- Your #datacenter can’t change fast enough
- Future Data Centers are Dynamic…but what about today’s Facilities?
- Applying the Scientific Method in Data Center Management
- Belden to Offer Future Facilities CFD Modeling for Data Centers
- The Fluid #DataCenter : Removing fear from the data center
- #DCIM Correct use of CFD & Engineering Simulation for #DataCenter Operation
- 3 Pillars of Modern #DataCenter Operations
- The start of something great…
- How #datacentres are still under pressure to meet renewable energy goals
- @VaporIO Unveils General Availability of #OpenDCRE @coleinthecloud
- Using CFD and Engineering Simulation Analysis for Product Development in DataCenters
- Modernizing Enterprise #DataCenters for Fun and Profit
- Zombie Servers : They’re Here and Doing Nothing but Burning #Datacenter Energy
- Breaking Design Barriers With #DataCenter Engineering Simulation
- Managing Airflow to Meet the Business Need
- The Mega DataCenter Challenge
- @Afcom @DataCenterWorld Using Simulation to Increase Efficiency, Resiliency, and Capacity
- What is CFD and Engineering Simulation
- Why aren’t #datacenters hotter?
- VIDEO Future Facilities updates 6SigmaDCX – What’s New in Release 9.3
- How to improve DCIM and Monitoring with Engineering Simulation
- Just in Time Design Build Data Centers
- Cooling the Cloud: Binghamton PhD Student Sets Sights on Improving DataCenter Efficiency
- Improving Monitoring with Simulation Part 1 Thermal Mapping
- June 2017
- April 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
You may have heard about computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling when it comes to the design of high-performance Formula 1 racecars. By using CFD modeling to maximize down-flow forces while minimizing friction – for the racecar body and smaller “wings and struts” – Formula 1 produces a winning combination.
In a similar manner, CFD can be used in today’s data centers during design, capacity planning, troubleshooting and day-to-day operations. It can be used to properly develop the best design and operations solutions throughout the entire data center ecosystem, from the micro environment (chips) to enclosure environments (cabinets and containment) to the macro environment (computer white space and the entire data center hall).
Here are three ways that your data center ecosystem can benefit from CFD.
1. Server Design and CFD Modeling
High-efficiency server manufacturers are pushing the limit on power efficiency and thermal boundaries. They use CFD modeling to optimize power and thermal characteristics.
A typical high-performance server is made up of precisely located components to optimize performance and efficiency: CPU, motherboard, power supply, CPU, storage, drives, fans, heat sinks and other components. To assist the design engineer in arranging these components to meet design objectives and maximize power and thermal goals, CFD modeling is used.
It provides a tool to virtually test a server in different configurations, taking into account different enclosure and cooling configurations, such as cold-aisle containment, hot-aisle containment, overhead supply, underfloor supply and rack-centered cooling solutions.
This technology can fine tune thermal characteristics of a server and provide a more accurate power/thermal baseline. Data center designers then use this information to develop the most efficient data center cooling solution possible.
Today’s CFD analysis tools can also coordinate the server, rack and data center hall to take full advantage of accurate server data to develop precise, energy-efficient enclosure/containment and high-performance cooling solutions.
CFD modeling can be used by design teams to test innovative cooling strategies as well. For example, it helps them better understand how liquid cooling technologies and cold plate options impact server performance.
2. Enclosure Design and CFD Modeling
CFD analysis provides flexibility for data center design teams to swap server models (and associated CFD results data) so they can simulate the answers to certain questions. For example, CFD analysis tells you whether a cabinet can respond to a swing in equipment power density from 5 kW to 15 kW.
Compared to designers having to use nameplate data or a “black box,” accurate results from CFD models of server equipment give designers the best data foundation possible to virtually push the capacity limits of an enclosure to obtain more capacity while following thermal guidelines from SLAs and ASHRAE.
Watch the video below:
3. Facility Design and CFD Modeling
Data center facilities engineering teams responsible for developing mechanical cooling strategies can benefit significantly from incorporating server and enclosure CFD modeling results into a CFD model of the data center hall.
Accurate temperature, pressure and airflow results from server and enclosure models can be used to develop a fine-tuned mechanical system design strategy (from chiller plant, pump selection and piping/valve selections to CRAC size and number, ductwork size, raised floor depth and control) that is correctly sized to accommodate Day 1 and Day 2 server loads.
A right-sized mechanical system offers several benefits:
- Reduced energy consumption
- Lower PUE (power usage effectiveness)
- Smaller mechanical footprint
- A mechanical system tuned directly to server loads
This results in enhanced server SLA compliance, reduced hotspots and a more efficient server.
How Belden Uses CFD
Belden uses CFD modeling to assist data center design professionals, managers and operators in designing efficient technology solutions for new and legacy data center environments.
CFD analysis provides predictive results that bridge high-performance computer server operations with the rack enclosure, and with the critical mechanical system.
Just as a fine-tuned Formula 1 racecar relies on highly trained engineers to develop the most efficient racecar possible, today’s high-performance data center operators can rely on Belden to do just the same: use highly trained engineers to develop an efficient solution that reduces costs, ensures uptime, maximizes space and saves times. Learn more here.
Data centers have had a problem with fire suppression systems. While trying to remove the threat of fire damage, they have actually introduced dangers of their own.
These systems operate by flooding the data center with inert gas, preventing fire from taking hold. However, to do this, they have to fill the space quickly, and this rapid expansion can create a shockwave, with vibrations that can damage the hard drives in the facility’s storage systems.
Image from: greenhousedata.com
A year ago, this happened in Glasgow, where a fire suppression system took out the local government’s email systems. And in September ING Bank in Romania was taken offline by a similar system. At the bank, there wasn’t even a fire. The system wrecked hard drives during a planned test of the fire suppressions system – one which had been unwisely scheduled for a busy lunchtime period.
These are just the incidents we know about. Ed Ansett of i3 has told us that this same problem has occurred on many occasions, but the data centers affected have chosen not to share the information.
It’s also likely these faults will happen more frequently as time passes because hard drives are evolving. To make higher capacity drives, vendors are allowing read/write heads to fly closer to the platters. This means they can resolve smaller magnetic domains, and more bits can fit on a disk. These drives have a smaller tolerance to shaking.
This is a shame because information leads to understanding, which is the key to solving the problem. To solve the problem, we need a scientific examination of how these incidents occur. And it turns out this is exactly what has been happening.
At DCD’s Zettastructure event in London last week, I heard about two very promising lines of inquiry that could make this problem simply disappear.
Fire suppression vendor Tyco believes that with drives becoming more fragile, more gentle nozzles are needed. The company has created a nozzle which will not shake drives, and will eventually be available as an upgrade to existing systems. Product manager Miguel Coll told me that the new nozzle is just as effective in suppressing fires, but does not produce a damaging shockwave.
That sounds like a problem solved – but there’s another approach. Future Facilities is well known for its computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, which models the flow of air in data centers and is usually used to ensure that hot air is removed efficiently and eddies don’t waste energy.
Future Facilities checked the physics and found its software could also model the flow of much faster air, including the shockwave produced when a fire suppression system floods the room with gas.
The company modeled the operation of the systems and found that the nozzles are usually placed too close to IT systems. The rules by which they are placed were set by authorities outside the data center industry and predate today’s IT systems.
Future Facilities product manager David King reckons the research means that the whole problem can be avoided by simply placing the nozzles according to CFD models of how they work.
The data center industry’s weapon in the war on risk and waste is science. I’ll publish more about this on DatacenterDynamics, while the agenda of the Zettastructure event is online and the presentations will be available.
Peter Judge is editor of DatacenterDynamics
Previously seen on Green Data Center News
In this third and final video of the series, we discuss the importance of ongoing Operational Planning on the thermal performance of your facility, and how engineering simulation can help you mitigate risk to your data center’s IT equipment.
Read the full article on Data Cneter Knowledge click here
Here are the top 10 most connected data centers, according to Cloudscene:
Number of service providers: 312
Location: Los Angeles (One Wilshire)
Number of service providers: 259
Number of service providers: 246
Number of service providers: 203
5. Telehouse North
Operator: Telehouse (subsidiary of KDDI)
Number of service providers: 197
Number of service providers: 187
Number of service providers: 184
8. Paris Voltaire
Number of service providers: 155
Number of service providers: 155
Location: Hong Kong
Number of service providers: 151
All images taken from websites of the data center providers on this list.
*Press Release on Data Center Knowledge: Performance Indicator, Green Grid’s New Data Center Metric, Explained
To find out more about The Performance Indicator visit thegreengrid.org
The Green Grid published PUE in 2007. Since then, the metric has become widely used in the data center industry. Not only is it a straightforward way to take a pulse of a data center’s electrical & mechanical infrastructure efficiency, but it is also a way to communicate how efficient or inefficient that infrastructure is to people who aren’t data center experts.
Building on PUE with Two More Dimensions
Performance Indicator builds on PUE, using a version of it, but also adds two other dimensions to infrastructure efficiency, measuring how well a data center’s cooling system does its job under normal circumstances and how well it is designed to withstand failure.
Unlike PUE, which focuses on both cooling and electrical infrastructure, PI is focused on cooling. The Green Grid’s aim in creating it was to address the fact that efficiency isn’t the only thing data center operators are concerned with. Efficiency is important to them, but so are performance of their cooling systems and their resiliency.
All three – efficiency, performance, and resiliency – are inextricably linked. You can improve one to the detriment of the other two.
By raising the temperature on the data center floor, for example, you can get better energy efficiency by reducing the amount of cold air your air conditioning system is supplying, but raise it too much, and some IT equipment may fail. Similarly, you can make a system more resilient by increasing redundancy, but increasing redundancy often has negative effect on efficiency, since you now have more equipment that needs to be powered and more opportunity for electrical losses. At the same time, more equipment means more potential points of failure, which is bad for resilience.
Different businesses value these three performance characteristics differently, Mark Seymour, CTO of Future Facilities and one of the PI metric’s lead creators, says. It may not be a big deal for Google or Facebook if one or two servers in a cluster go down, for example, and they may choose not to sacrifice an entire multi-megawatt facility’s energy efficiency to make sure that doesn’t happen. If you’re a high-frequency trader, however, a failed server may mean missing out on a lucrative trade, and you’d rather tolerate an extra degree of inefficiency than let something like that happen.
PI measures where your data center is on all three of these parameters and, crucially, how a change in one will affect the two others. This is another crucial difference from PUE: PI, used to its full potential, has a predictive quality PUE does not.
It is three numbers instead of one, making PI not quite as simple as PUE, but Seymour says not to worry: “It’s three numbers, but they’re all pretty simple.”
The Holy Trinity of Data Center Metrics
The three dimensions of PI are PUE ratio, or PUEr, IT Thermal Conformance, and IT Thermal Resilience. Their relationship is visualized as a triangle on a three-axis diagram:
Example visualization of Performance Indicator for a data center (Courtesy of The Green Grid)
PUEr is a way to express how far your data center is from your target PUE. The Green Grid defines seven PUE ranges, from A to G, each representing a different level of efficiency. A, the most efficient range, is 1.15 to 1.00, while G, the least efficient one, ranges from 4.20 to 3.20.
Every data center falls into one of the seven categories, and your PUEr shows how far you currently are from the lower end of your target range (remember, lower PUE means higher efficiency).
So, if your facility’s current PUE is 1.5, which places you into category C (1.63 – 1.35), and your target is to be at the top of C, you would divide 1.35 by 1.5 and get a PUEr of 90% as a result. You do have to specify the category you’re in, however, so the correct way to express it would be PUEr(C)=90%.
IT Thermal Conformance is simply the proportion of IT equipment that is operating inside ASHRAE’s recommended inlet-air temperature ranges. In other words, it shows you how well your cooling system is doing what it’s designed to do. To find it, divide the amount of equipment that’s within the ranges by the total amount of equipment, Seymour explains.
The Green Grid chose to use ASHRAE’s recommendations, but data center operators may choose to determine themselves what temperature ranges are acceptable to them or use manufacturer-specified thermal limits without degrading the metric’s usefulness, he adds.
IT Thermal Resilience shows how much IT equipment is receiving cool air within ASHRAE’s allowable or recommended temperature ranges when redundant cooling units are not operating, either because of a malfunction or because of scheduled maintenance. In other words, if instead of 2N or N+1, you’re left only with N, how likely are you to suffer an outage?
This is calculated the same way IT Thermal Conformance is calculated, only the calculation is done while the redundant cooling units are off-line. Of course, The Green Grid would never tell you to intentionally turn off redundant cooling units. Instead, they recommend that this measurement be taken either when the units are down for maintenance, or, better yet, that you use modeling software to simulate the conditions.
Modeling Makes PI Much More Useful
Modeling software with simulation capabilities used in combination with PI can be a powerful tool for making decisions about changes in your data center. You can see how adding more servers will affect efficiency, resiliency, and cooling capacity in your facility, for example.
This is where it’s important to note that Future Facilities is a vendor of modeling software for data centers. But Seymour says that about 50 members of The Green Grid from many different companies, including Teradata, IBM, Schneider Electric, and Siemens, participated in the metric’s development, implying that the process wasn’t influenced by a single vendor’s commercial interest.
Four Levels of Performance Indicator
The Green Grid describes four levels of PI assessment, ranging from least to most precise. Not every data center is instrumented with temperature sensors at every server, and Level 1 is an entry-level assessment, based on rack-level temperature measurements. ASHRAE recommends taking temperature readings at three points per rack, which would work well for a Level 1 PI assessment, Seymour explains.
Level 2 is also based on measurements, but it requires measurements at every server. To get this level of assessment, a data center has to be instrumented with server-level sensors and DCIM software or some other kind of monitoring system.
If you want to get into predictive modeling, welcome to PI Level 3. This is where you make a PI assessment based on rack-level temperature readings, but you use them to create a model, which enables you to simulate future states and get an idea of how the system may behave if you make various changes. “That gives the opportunity to start making better future plans,” Seymour says.
This is where you can also find out whether your data center can handle the load it’s designed for. Say you’re running at 50% of the data center’s design load, which happens to be 2MW. If you create a model, simulate a full-load scenario, and find that either your IT Thermal Conformance or your IT Thermal Resilience is only what you want it to be at 1.8MW, you’ve wasted your money.
Those are just a couple of possible use cases. There are many more, especially with PILevel 4, which is similar to Level 3 but with a much more precise model. This model is calibrated using temperature readings from as many points on the data center floor as possible: servers, perforated tiles, return-air intake on cooling units, etc. This is about making sure the model truly represents the state of the data center.
Different operators will choose to start at different levels of PI assessment, Seymour says. Which level they choose will depend on their current facility and their business needs. The point of having all four levels to avoid preventing anyone from using the new metric because their facility doesn’t have enough instrumentation or because they haven’t been using monitoring or modeling software.
To find out more about The Performance Indicator visit thegreengrid.org
Originally released on Data Center Knowledge: http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2016/07/18/performance-indicator-green-grids-new-data-center-metric-explained/